tiistai 9. lokakuuta 2007

Mobile WOM Manifesto

If you receive a message on your mobile phone from a good friend of yours, would you open it? Surely. If the message contains some sort of a commercial message, would you read it? Most likely and certainly if your friend refers to it. Would you be offended or disturbed by this message? Most probably not. On the contrary, the odds are that you are interested in it because your close friend, who knows you, thought so. In addition, you are probably pleased that your friend thought about you, and you are flattered that he or she took the time to contact you, maybe even to the point that you will act upon the commercial message either by forwarding the message further or by purchasing the product or service promoted.

The scenario above explains why mobile media as a personal communication tool would seem to be the optimal platform for word-of-mouth (WOM) marketing. Still, groundbreaking mobile WOM campaigns are yet to be seen. Why?

Five years ago, I was doing my master’s thesis for Starcut Ltd. I studied how it would be possible to generate WOM around motion pictures using mobile devices. Back then, the buzz about WOM was only starting. The vast majority of mobile devices were still black & white and could hardly display an image. The content industries were in panic because of piracy and peer-to-peer distribution. It was clear that the industry wasn’t ready for mobile word-of-mouth marketing campaigns that needed understanding about WOM mechanisms, sophisticated mobiles devices, and a willingness to trust consumers to distribute branded content.

Since those days online word-of-mouth marketing has gained a lot of momentum. The fragmentation of media channels, the growing importance of reaching niche audiences and markets, and the poor return on investment (ROI) figures of traditional marketing methods have forced marketing professionals to look for alternative means to attract consumers’ attention.

Marketing techniques relying on word-of-mouth communication, that is non-commercial person-to-person communication concerning a brand, product or service, are not, however, a new or even a recent phenomenon. They have been studied since the 1950’s both by academics and marketing research companies. The interest towards word of mouth communication originates from studies trying to analyze consumers’ purchase decision behavior. Practically all studies demonstrated that the most influential advice and information regarding buying decisions come from the consumers’ peers.

Further research proved that through WOM, information can spread fast to different consumer clusters without loosing its persuasiveness and that WOM is especially influential in service industries where customer experience is paramount.

Over the years, many trials were made to harness the word of mouth concerning a given product, brand, or service. Although the results proved that within certain boundaries WOM can be influenced, WOM marketing strategies remained marginal within the over-all marketing mix, mostly because of the difficulty to measure the impact of WOM campaigns.

The digital revolution of the 90’s gave a new start to WOM-based marketing solutions. With the help of Internet and email people could communicate a lot easier and faster with much more people than before. The digital communication tools provided also new means to measure WOM and service providers could benefit from customer feedback and ratings to improve their service. This online WOM gave rise to such successes as Hotmail, Amazon.com, and Ebay. In academic circles, digital networks gave rise to a new interest in network analysis, links, and the small world –theory, all tightly connected to WOM research.

After the year 2000, the number of business books published on WOM has exploded many of them specializing in one form of sub-genre of WOM, such as viral, buzz, stealth, guerilla or influencer marketing. Numerous companies have specialized on WOM marketing, and the industry has organized itself around Word of Mouth Marketing Association WOMMA, founded in 2004. In addition, all successful web 2.0 services from YouTube to Facebook seem to be using WOM mechanisms as building blocks of their service offering. I must say, it is an exciting time to continue my research, now as a doctoral student, on word-of-mouth mechanisms and service design.

But coming back to my starting point, why hasn’t WOM reached the mobile media on a large scale? My guess is that the mobile industry has had a dubious attitude towards all sorts of marketing due to the fear of spam. It was because of spam that European Union enforced its opt-in regulation back in 2002 and for the very same reason industry organizations elsewhere in the world took similar self-regulating actions.

This fear is certainly well grounded when it comes to mobile advertising, but NGO-driven mobile campaigns have shown that WOM works also on portable devices. Only ten days ago, a worldwide SMS campaign urged people to wear red on September 28th in order to support the demonstrators in Burma (Myanmar) and last Friday I received a text message originating from Amnesty International inviting people to light candles in front of Russian Embassies to remember the murder of Anna Politkovskaya. I forwarded the messages, not to everyone on my contact list, but only to a selected few that I thought would appreciate it. I bet I am not only one acting this way.

Last September showed some signs that also mobile industry is slowly getting rid of its fears. September 17th Nokia announced the acquisition of Enpocket, a company providing mobile advertising campaign systems and management. A week later, Blyk, the first free ad-supported mobile phone service went live in the UK. Who knows, maybe next week we will hear of the first mobile WOM campaign. But no matter when it takes place, I am sure that the first company succeeding in making users forward its ads to their peers on mobile media is going to be on everybody’s lips.

4 kommenttia:

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

Hello,

my name is Dietmar from the University of Augsburg. I was very impressed by your "Mobile WOM Manifesto". Some of your ideas we have also included in our papers. Please feel free to download them on http://www.wi-mobile.de/projekte-studien.0.html.

However, there is one big issue in mobile vial marketing, as we call it:

No claim, mobile viral marketing works, however, not in the same way as (electronic) viral marketing does on the Internet. For instance, the Hotmail or skype services use electronic viral strategies that have mostly used traceable viruses, i.e., they capture friends of friends’ contact dates and are great for database building and campaign tracking. Applying this, indeed, traceable viral technique is proving much more challenging on the mobile channel.

With this personal medium users are reluctant to pass on their friends’ MSISDN to a frim, e.g., as it is done with send to a friend applications. Thus, I assume that the true power of mobile viral marketing is founded in invisible and not measurable viruses, where one user simply shows another a mobile viral content on their mobile device. Due to transaction cost content is copied between devices via Bluetooth, Infrared, or Near Field Communication, or loaded from a memory card or across a wire from a personal computer. With invisible viruses, the downside is that users’ actions cannot be tracked and databases cannot be built. Marketers must be aware of this paradigm shift in viral marketing.

How do you think about that issue?

Regards,
Dietmar Wiedemann
dietmar.wiedemann[A]wi-mobile.de

Kai Huotari kirjoitti...

Dear Dietmar Wiedemann,

Sorry for not having noticed your comment earlier.

I agree with you that mobile viral marketing will differ from viral marketing happening on the web. The reasons are multiple. As you stated, cost-free mobile communication possibilities (bluetooth, infrared, etc.) and users' reluctance to pass on information about their friends to marketers make it much harder to trace viral messages. I suspect also that users' motivations for WOM change as the communication platform changes. Text messages are, for example, much more personal than emails. They require more effort and they are not, usually, free of charge. These investments in time and money probably make the messages less viral but, on the other hand, strengthen their impact on the receivers. In my opinion, this should affect the goals of mobile WOM campaigns.

However, wireless broadband subscriptions are gaining in popularity and the mobile use of Internet and web is becoming more and more commonplace, especially with iPhone. Mobile Internet will, for sure, affect the ways we communicate with our mobile handsets. One can imagine that this will also open new opportunities for the measurement of WOM on mobile devices. It will be exciting to see.

Anonyymi kirjoitti...

There are so many online stores offering replica Hermes bags that you can always choose a trustworthy one. The quality of materials reflects the owner's financial status and taste. Leather is always a wise choice, for it is classic and versatile; works with most outfits and goes with any situation.

mulberry outlet kirjoitti...

Everyone is a hero, everyone has the opportunity to make a fortune, your blog well, I am very optimistic about you, then you can look forward to a good development. This is me,Authentic Mulberry Alexa Bag and there is a chance to look at Discount Mulberry Handbags , and holding to join in Mulberry Factory Shop .

We have a huge range of Mulberry bags sale,The styles of Mulberry Outlet will absolutely give your eyes an shock! You can find the best Mulberry bags from Mulberry Factory Shop. 80% off are from Mulberryoutletfactorys.Com . Buy discount Mulberry Bags now!

Welcome to my homepage : http://www.mulberryoutletfactorys.com